[ltc8k6]

Editorial made rape case about race, class

---

Your editorial about the recent "60 Minutes" report mischaracterizes both what the district attorney's role has been in the Duke lacrosse rape case and why some of us have criticized him. Like much of the media hype that has surrounded the case, your editorial turns the case into an ugly caricature by suggesting that the decision to prosecute the Duke students was made by a valiant prosecutor on a white horse who is defending a helpless black woman who "ranks near the bottom of society." That is what the prosecutor also suggested when he told a largely African-American audience that he personally would protect "this black girl" from the hooligans at Duke. I find that characterization of the case offensive and patronizing. Why do you say the accuser is "near the bottom of society?" She is an apparently talented student and mother who dances to support herself and her child. She is a woman, not a "black girl." Trying to make this case about race and class has done a great disservice to Durham. From the start, it should have been handled as just an alleged rape that had to be investigated and prosecuted if the evidence warranted it. As someone who has criticized Nifong's handling of the case, I have not called for him to dismiss it; rather, I have suggested only that a special prosecutor be appointed who can make the kind of disinterested decisions about the case that Nifong has shown himself incapable of making. If the case goes to trial, it should be based on the strength of the evidence against the defendants, rather than as a convenient way to shift responsibility for ending what now appears to be a highly questionable prosecution to a judge or jury.


JAMES E. COLEMAN
Durham
October 20, 2006
The writer is a law professor at Duke University who was interviewed on the “60 Minutes” broadcast. The length rule for letters was waived.

[CondorFlight]

If the case goes to trial, it should be based on the strength of the evidence against the defendants, rather than as a convenient way to shift responsibility for ending what now appears to be a highly questionable prosecution to a judge or jury.

[Constitutions Grandchild]

Is James Coleman married -- I think I'm in love.

[bjc]

Coleman is exactly right and his letter pinpoints the underlying condescension of most knee-jerk liberals like those who apparently write the HS editorials.

[Jezebelle]

Out with Brodhead, in with Coleman.

I like the way Coleman sets up his point and then makes it succinctly without a nod to politically correct euphemisms and lukewarm equivocations.