Posted on 10/18/2006 2:45:47 PM PDT by zaxxon
http://www.dukechronicle.com/media/storage/paper884/news/2006/10/24/Columns/The-Administrations.Mismanagement.Of.Lacrosse-2384801.shtml?norewrite200610240812&sourcedomain=www.dukechronicle.com
The administration's mismanagement of lacrosse
Guest column
Steven Baldwin
Posted: 10/24/06
Last April I wrote to The Chronicle in support of Mike Pressler, former coach of men's lacrosse at Duke. At that time I was concerned that the decision to fire him had been premature, coming only a few weeks after the fateful Buchanan Street party, and certainly long before all of the facts were known. Now, six months later, it is quite clear that my concerns were justified.
I do not ascribe to President Brodhead's position that someone had to fall on his sword to atone for the March 13 lacrosse party. But even if one does buy into that silly notion, why was it coach Pressler? Certainly the several reports emanating from President Brodhead's committee's looking into the lacrosse incident identified a number of individuals more culpable than Pressler. If the goal were to send a message, wouldn't firing Executive Vice President Tallman Trask, Athletics Director Joe Alleva, Vice President Larry Moneta or Dean of Students Sue Wasiolek-or all of them-have been more appropriate?
As displeased as I am with Pressler's firing, my biggest concern has always been with Duke's treatment of the student athletes at the center of the storm. These kids were abandoned by their university. At least one of the indicted students, perhaps all three, was trespassed from Duke property. They were denied the presumption of innocence, despite the mounting evidence that the case against them is made of smoke and mirrors and is fatally flawed procedurally. They have been pilloried by their faculty and scorned by the administration. They are pariahs.
As a Duke faculty member I regard my students in much the same way I regard my children. When my kids do something wrong, I demand accountability. When they break the rules they pay the price, whatever that might be.
With that accountability, however, comes support. My kids know I love them and that I will do everything I can to help them through the rough times. That is what families do. I treat my students the same way.
Duke students should expect nothing less from their university. The day they set foot on the Duke Campus for the first time they became members of the Duke family. For most this was the beginning of a life-long relationship that generates intense loyalties and deep love. The assumption is that the relationship is reciprocal, that Duke holds all of its students in high esteem-loves them-and will support them through the rough times as well as the good. Instead, Duke has disowned its lacrosse-playing student athletes. Their treatment has been shameful.
Over the past six to eight years, I can recall having only a single men's lacrosse player in one of my undergraduate classes. That young man was bright, focused, respectful and engaged. He earned one of the highest grades in a large, difficult and very competitive class. He is now in medical school, well on his way to a career as an orthopedic surgeon.
I mention this because I believe the young man would not mind my describing him in these terms. On the other hand I do not believe that a faculty member publicly describing any student in pejorative terms is ever justified. To do so is mean-spirited, petty and unprofessional, at the very least. The faculty who publicly savaged the character and reputations of specific men's lacrosse players last spring should be ashamed of themselves.
They should be tarred and feathered, ridden out of town on a rail and removed from the academy. Their comments were despicable. I suspect they were also slanderous, but we'll hear more about that later.
Finally, I urge the Duke community to take a reality check. Speak your minds. Do what you think is right. Tell the administration that you are not satisfied with the way they have handled the lacrosse affair. Demand better.
Steven Baldwin is a professor in the Chemistry department.
Any objective editor would at least give you the courtesy of a "mea culpa, mea maxima culpa"!!
Pinging the DukeLax list with a must read column from Duke Chemistry professor Steven Baldwin...
BUMP.
Reality check, is right.
Great article.
This is excellent!!!!!!
Larry Jones owns The Gallery and Diamond Girls.
Is he the same Larry Jones who served as Interim Director of the Durham Housing Authority?
Excellent. Professor Baldwin is worthy of his honorific, which is more than can be said of the despicable and ever infamous 88.
What a great article! Professor Baldwin gets it. Thanks for the ping.
2nd. That's a great letter.
" He is now in medical school, well on his way to a career as an orthopedic surgeon."
Wow. Another "special admit" that didn't deserve to be there except for the fact he could play lacrosse. /sarc
And by this way, I'll bet this is more typical of many of the faculty from whom we have not heard.
Spare us the tap dancing Cash.
Getting Nifonged is a new term many of us use as a result of this Duke hoax case. Most of us are already very well aware of the term getting O.J'd. Why must you continue your tap dance all the while ignoring the huge pink elephant in the middle of the living room? Just type it up, it is what it is.... "There very well may be blacks on the jury who will vote to convict the accused because they are white, regardless of evidence".
Most of us already know that's what you mean...
Good letter, until he mentioned tar and feathers. TFTP!
Well, Brodhead, as responsible leader, should have taken the hit and fallen on HIS sword.
Oops, did I say Brodhead and "responsible leader" in the same sentence?
My mistake.
As I've said here many times: Terry Sanford weeps.
From the Durham County Board of Elections:
Director Ashe states winners in the general election
are determined by 'most votes cast', and not a majority
nor a 'substantial plurality'.
They keep a running total of ballots cast since start
last week, posted prominently by the electronic ballot
counter. As of this morning, 570 ballots have been
cast in person at the old Durham Athletic Park location.
The candidates signs are thick outside the one-stop
polling place. Mostly judgeships. The petitions from
this past summer are a public record and anyone can
obtain them. They run a very tight ship down at the
BOE now. 10/24/06
Wow! Thanks for the ping. That was great to see.
During the spring, members of the team and several members of the athletics department received death threats
Ah, yes, our New Black Panther friends.
Funny how a supposed "racist pamphlet" (probably a plant by the pot-bangers, BTW) received press attention, but the violent threats by their liberal friends was not condemned.
Kennedy said, adding that student-athletes' safety was one of the primary concerns for cancelling the 2006 season.
*Koff*
Backpeddle much?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.