[Locomotive Breath]

Wow - what a lot of work - that explains why you took so long to answer. How old is that thread?

The topic of that prior thread was ABOUT the character of the woman involved and what she said. And only that. And that's what my post addressed. If, on the basis of her remark, I had gone on to say "I'll bet she puts puppies in blenders" that would have been just as much of a non sequitur as you thinking that CF's behavior in D.C. had any relevance to a thread on whether he's a rapist.

You said you didn't like CF, we said "so what - we like him", and you said you don't like CF several more times trying to convince us that we shouldn't like him either. What's your point?

[Krankor]

I'm sorry, I have to to work- I can't dedicate my life to one thread. I didn't realize there's a statute of limitations on judging a person based on one incident in their life- comments can come back to haunt you if you're not consistent. Again, re-read the current thread and you'll see there are dozens of posts that have nothing to do with the lacrosse players' guilt. Since you obviously have so much time on your hands, perhaps you can chastise each one of them for not following your thread rules. I didn't realize there was a posting quota in your threads. Please let me know what it is, so I don't violate your Free Republic guidelines. If you're not interested in allowing an opinion that doesn't toe the line with yours, I suggest you apply for a position with Mike Nifong.