Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWCtaz

Under normal circumstances, the exculpatory evidence would have been considered but, more than that, the determination as to whether or not there had even been a crime would have been examined. NEITHER happened in this case.


797 posted on 10/16/2006 7:32:21 AM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 746 | View Replies ]


To: Jezebelle; investigateworld

I wonder how unusual it is for an indictment to be brought down without ever having SPOKEN to ANY of the accused.


821 posted on 10/16/2006 8:21:02 AM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 797 | View Replies ]

To: Jezebelle

You are correct as to the facts of this case. My comment was about the life changing effects for the subject of any false rape accusation. I think we can all agree that the Duke case is an aberration of the CJS.
(At least I hope it is!)


873 posted on 10/16/2006 9:13:02 AM PDT by VRWCtaz ("Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness." - Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 797 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson