[Constitutions Grandchild]

Read it, too. Agree with Jezebelle as to style, but I think the writer misses the part about the lack of investigation and the hijacking of the investigation. Seems he's a little shy about putting the blame squarely where it belongs. It's still all about racial problems and women's rights and his fear that real rapists will walk. The line about white rapists "waltzing" also struck me. Didn't I read that White on Black rapes are extremely rare? That when they are tracked it takes in all "Caucasians" like Hispanic gang-type rapes as well?

[Jezebelle]

Yeah, I agree. There is some bias in the piece exemplified by the belief that whitey "waltzes" in the rare event when he inflicts rape on a black woman, a fact the author neglects to mention, but nevertheless I see a hearty attempt to be fair in terms of the overall negative ramifications this has had on blacks, as fair as somebody writing for a black publication dares to be, at any rate.

We all know that some people beat the charges, no matter whether it's rape or murder, but for even one criminal to "waltz", be it white-on-black or black-on-white, is unfortunate and not beneficial to society.

[Fido969]

still all about racial problems and women's rights

The leftie bugabears, for the most part, don't exist. The lefties and MSM look and look for evidence, but it isn't there. So when something looks like it MIGHT prove their point, they pounce it it and say: See! It's OBVIOUS!

Problem is, it was never there in the first place.

people will always see what you ask them to look for.