Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duke Lacrosse 60 Minutes Broadcast (Live Thread)
CBS News ^ | 10/15/2006 | Locomotive Breath

Posted on 10/15/2006 5:52:10 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath

(CBS) The three Duke lacrosse players indicted for a rape they say they didn't commit are indignant over the effect the charges are having on their lives and their families.

In their first interviews, they speak to Ed Bradley this Sunday, Oct. 15, at 7 p.m. ET/PT.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Local News; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; durham; durhamdirtbag; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 1,321-1,332 next last
To: Howlin

If anyone missed the Duke segment on 60 minutes, all they need to know is.....

1. CBS's six month investigation, black Ben Bradlee, and esteemed black Duke legal expert, have destroyed any credibility Nifong might have had. Nifong's only hope is the stripper refuses to testify and Nifong can drop the case by using the excuse, "without her testimony, I don't have a case."

2. The 3 Duke players are amazing young men. 60 Minutes showcased their innocence.


501 posted on 10/15/2006 6:22:21 PM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Come on you guys. She has to support her kids and pay tuition. She has to keep working. She also had to buy a new shoe.


502 posted on 10/15/2006 6:22:27 PM PDT by RecallMoran (Recall Brodhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Thanks for the good report. I am so glad it went well for them .


503 posted on 10/15/2006 6:23:41 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

I made a point of mentioning "black" Bradley, and the Duke expert being black because I thought it important for people to know, the black community can't blame tonight's 60 Minutes, or the eventual outcome, on racism.


504 posted on 10/15/2006 6:26:34 PM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
I think they MAY have seen it as a power-hungry DA against some innocent kids (way for libs to view this without revoking their lib cards...) It was shockingly pro-defense, AKA truthful, IMO. Otherwise, I'm with you. They (CBS) are generally horrible.

What has resulted in this 60 Minutes segment is a decision by the liberal media establishment to do a little damage control.

Apparently it has became clear even to the aging lefties at 60 Minutes that the travesty that is the Duke lacrosse case actually works more to discredit their liberal racist agenda than to help it, and is precisely the kind of event that might cause a few independent-minded black folks and soccer moms to begin to question some assumptions about the liberal party line.

And so, as they have concluded that the Duke boys are very unlikely to in fact end up being successfully railroaded, they have decided to get out in front of it now.

Isn't it interesting that 60 Minutes said they have been studying this case intensively for SIX MONTHS? It wouldn't take a person of average intelligence more than a few hours of familiarizing himself with the reported facts of the case to come the same conclusion as 60 Minutes.

And note how careful they were to have the most damaging conclusions about the case articulated by a black Duke law professor.

BTW, I note that Kim has NOT changed her story in any important respect as to the facts of what she observed in her various accounts of that night. What she claims to be her "opinion" as to whether the Duke boys might have done it may have changed, but she has been fairly careful to be consistent in her account of the hard facts of what she saw and heard.

And how does Leslie Stahl manage to keep a straight face while pretending to sympathize with a Christian critic bemoaning Bush's failure to do more to accomplish his faith-based initiative? Extra botox injections?

505 posted on 10/15/2006 6:27:40 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
And of course poor, traumatized Precious was stripping about the time N&O published its article "Dance gives details of ordeal," the players had to submit to DNA tests, and Ruth Sheehan claimed "Team silence is sickening." Two weeks after the party, which would make it March 27th, Precious was performing in a strip club, and was able to perform her routines there "normally." Well, I sure am glad her performance level hasn't suffered because of her "ordeal."
506 posted on 10/15/2006 6:28:18 PM PDT by jennyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
You make a good point that it will take a trial to prove their innocence. However, that trial may not be held in a criminal court.
507 posted on 10/15/2006 6:28:28 PM PDT by VRWCtaz ("Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness." - Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Yes, it is a word, but as you can see here on dictionary.com:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/illiberal

the American left is more illiberal than liberal these days.


508 posted on 10/15/2006 6:29:26 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I missed a live thread!!!! ~sobbing~

Thanks for the posts....most excellent!


509 posted on 10/15/2006 6:29:44 PM PDT by Jrabbit (Scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hogeye13

I'm gonna have to have a front seat at that trial!


510 posted on 10/15/2006 6:30:19 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

So they may have learned something from Dan? (Good post)


511 posted on 10/15/2006 6:30:23 PM PDT by RecallMoran (Recall Brodhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: RecallMoran

LOL.......Does Payless sell shoes singularly?


512 posted on 10/15/2006 6:31:07 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Ed Bradley = 60 Minutes

Ben Bradlee = Watergate Era editor of the Washington Post.

There also do not appear to be related. :-)


513 posted on 10/15/2006 6:31:30 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Duke Players Talk on'60 Minutes'

Sunday, October 15, 2006

By AARON BEARD, Associated Press Writer

RALEIGH, N.C. — The three members of Duke University's lacrosse team charged with rape say they had expected DNA testing would clear them of a crime they insist they did not commit.

They said Sunday they were frustrated when authorities continued to pursue the case after those tests failed to find a match with the accuser.

"We were told it would help to clear everything up,"said Collin Finnerty, 20, who was interviewed on CBS'"60 Minutes"along with Reade Seligmann, 20, and David Evans, 23."So we were happy to go."

The accuser, a student at nearby North Carolina Central University, told police she was raped in a bathroom by three men at a March 13 off-campus team party where she had been hired to perform as a stripper. Evans told"60 Minutes"he cooperated with police as soon as they arrived to start investigating the allegations.

"It was scary,"Evans said."I woke up from a nap to 10 police officers in my living room with a search warrant. I went through every part of it _ told'em where they could find things and that we'd fully cooperate and answer any questions they had." -cut-

http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2006Oct15/0,4670,DukeLacrosse,00.html


514 posted on 10/15/2006 6:31:48 PM PDT by xoxoxox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies]

To: JLS

I get pretty creative with names, don't I?


515 posted on 10/15/2006 6:32:47 PM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: VRWCtaz

I disagree; I believe the only place they can clear their names is in this dog and pony show that Nifong has set into action.


516 posted on 10/15/2006 6:34:15 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: xoxoxox

So they word is getting out finally.

Excellent.

And thank you for all you've done on these threads in the past.


517 posted on 10/15/2006 6:34:54 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

You are very creative with names as you say. I did not check the spelling Ben Bradelies name. I take it you are old enough like me to have the random Watergate era media names confounding current names in your head?


518 posted on 10/15/2006 6:35:11 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies]

To: Jrabbit

Do you have an excuse, young lady??


519 posted on 10/15/2006 6:35:27 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

The only thing that will clear their names is a conviction of Nifong.

Absent a conviction of Nifong, some will believe Mangum was just so tramatize or even out of it that she could not ID the "right" perps or that someone got to Roberts and bought her off etc. That is the one reason I think these parents may well spend some serious money and influence to take down Nifong.


520 posted on 10/15/2006 6:37:39 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 1,321-1,332 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson