Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: all4one

The problem isn't the porno.
The problem was him in the porno.


466 posted on 10/13/2006 3:04:16 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Him being IN the porn would be a major stumbling block to living happily ever after.


475 posted on 10/13/2006 3:23:09 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies ]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
"On Sept. 28, one of the children confronted Schelske, 43, at the couple’s Franklin home when he was watching pornography on TV, the filing stated. The couple’s children are 2, 3 and 7 years old."

This above statement is where there is a problem with the porn itself. The problem with him "in" the porno would have only been between he and his wife, and how they would deal with it. But bringing it into the home with young children and having a child confront the father is a whole different story. Very sad for the whole family.

I also don't put it past any lawyer to try a case in the court of public opinion. It would be very easy to verify the allegations against the husband if there is forensic info. on the computer with the photos, etc. This situation would not be easy for any family; but even more sad to have everything played out in the public eye.

480 posted on 10/13/2006 3:54:15 PM PDT by all4one (9/11 Never Forget - Never Forgive -- Prayers for the families & our soldiers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson