Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jezebelle

Oh, I wasn't discussing that part; I should have been clearer; I was talking about if they were to find them guilty, a judge can set aside the verdict.

I have never been involved with anything like that and frankly am not involved in cases where that would be a course anybody I work for or with would have to ever avail themselves of.

I tried to Google it, but couldn't find anything pertaining to NC; did you?


754 posted on 10/14/2006 9:39:08 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 752 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin

Yes, a directed verdict could occur if there's a trial and they're found guilty. In that case, the judge changes the jury's verdict to "not guilty." The questions are, does NC have a legal capacity for factual finding of innocence when a jury acquits (possibly, is my guess), and also does it have procedural vehicle by which the court can find, after or as part of a dismissal of charges, that the defendants are factually innocent of the crime with which they were charged (probably not, is my guess), or that there is insufficient evidence to substantiate that a crime has been committed (probably yes, is my guess). No, I haven't googled any of that.


768 posted on 10/14/2006 10:09:00 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson