And let's look at Liefong's consistency issues while we're at it, too. He said the DNA would prove who did what and clear the innocent, yet he indicted when the DNA turned up bupkees. He said Mangum was held from behind in a choke-hold. She was not. He said the medical evidence would prove this was a brutal attack, but it shows the opposite. He said condoms were likely used, but Mangum had already told the medical staff that no condoms were used. He said a date-rape drug may have been used, knowing full well the test was negative for that. He said the boys didn't cooperate, but that is also not borne out by the evidence. I'm sure y'all can add to the list of his "inconsistencies." Liefong's list of "inconsistencies" probably approaches Mangum's list of "inconsistencies" in length, and he's the PROSECUTOR!