Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SarahUSC

The fact that Nifong refused to participate is slightly encouraging that the report isn't favorable to the prosecution, but that's tea leaves-reading.


49 posted on 10/11/2006 11:52:39 AM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Jezebelle

Nifong declined to participate? Hmm. I didn't know that. It sounds like good news. Then again, I don't see how Nifong could risk it. He'd get asked alot of questions and he doesn't have answers for any of them. How could he possibly explain his conduct?


53 posted on 10/11/2006 12:03:55 PM PDT by SarahUSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Jezebelle
Nifong can't give interviews. Lawyers are covered by the judges' ruling. Witnesses are not covered anymore. But Nifong can't give interviews.
119 posted on 10/11/2006 7:23:39 PM PDT by jennyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson