[Jezebelle]

That's my point. Mangum said it, not Kim. So how does Wiehl claim Kim has changed her story? She's spinning.

[JLS]

That's my point. Mangum said it, not Kim. So how does Wiehl claim Kim has changed her story? She's spinning.

Exactly, Roberts has said:

1. The rape allegation was a "crock."

2. She did not see a rape.

3. She thought more than underaged drinking went on, but she did not see a rape.

4. Mangum was lying when she said that the two of them were holding on to each other and pulled apart by six men.

5. Mangum did not appear hurt or harmed or in anyway like she had been raped when they left the party.

None of these statements are in conflict. As far as I can remember, none of them conflict with what she said in her original statement either. She did not mention point 4 which she surely would have had it actually happened.