Gladly . . . not difficult in the least. (As an aside, you may wish to review the International Brotherhood of Teamsters official position on this subject). Let's do a compare and contrast, shall we?
From the resolution:
Whereas it would be particularly difficult for Americans to collect insurance from Mexican companies which employ Mexican drivers involved in accidents in the United States, which would increase the insurance rates for American drivers;From the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Fact Sheet .Whereas future unrestricted foreign trucking into the United States can pose a safety hazard due to inadequate maintenance and inspection, and can act collaterally as a conduit for the entry into the United States of illegal drugs, illegal human smuggling, and terrorist activities . . . .
North American Free Trade Agreement - U.S. Department of Transportation Regulations


All of your arguments, as well as mine and others on these threads are blown to the wind, because H. CON. RES. 487, not only confirms our discussions as being true, and trumps yours as being bogus anti American sovereignty drivel . Yes, the bill is in committee. However, when and if (I believe it will) it ever reaches the floor, there could be pro and con amendments, and maybe not to everyones liking. Are you saying that these four Republican Congressmen are "tin foil hat" liars. If so, that's DU troll talk! Other then being a self admitted CFR lobbyist, I don't want to believe you're a DU mole too! |