Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wolfcreek

"I'm glad this is coming to the forefront. No doubt this will shake the psyche of some here on the FR."

I doubt it. They've made a much too well-organized attempt to silence all discussion on this issue, including being permitted to make personal attacks against anyone involved on the threads. My guess is that with this news, they are re-grouping or looking for direction on what to do next.

Perhaps they will come clean about being in AGREEMENT with what's being proposed instead of denying what's being proposed exists?


17 posted on 10/02/2006 6:09:23 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Kimberly GG
My guess is that with this news, they are re-grouping or looking for direction on what to do next.

That would be my guess as well.

19 posted on 10/02/2006 6:13:10 AM PDT by processing please hold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG

The merits of the project aside, my initial objection is the anti-democratic nature of having something that affects the country so much not being the subject of congressional oversight, or even free and open discussion of the plans, goals, and participants in the plan. No matter what the project, we the people should have government in the sunshine, with a chance to see what it is we are paying for, and what will affect our lives.
I don't believe that the private organizations involved are sufficient to keep the faith with anything other than their own interests. I would prefer that the administration not force people to beg for information. All it does is creates suspician when no suspician is warranted, or it creates confidence that the government can do know wrong, when in fact it certainly can.

Where is the opportunity for public imput into what is at least being alleged as one of the most significant policies to affect American commerce in many years?

Private organizations, no matter what they publish for or against, are not a protection of the public. There is no guarantee that what is published by them is true, accurtate and complete, and being private, they have no oversight.

I don't think web sites by private organizations constitues public involvement in the decision making process at all.

I don't trust any government that says,, "Hey, if you nwant to know what's going on, demand a hearing in congress!" Maybe we'll hold a hearing before this all becomes a fait accompli. Yeah, right...government in the sunshine by true men of the people...

After all, we're all to stupid to vote and run the country, right?


20 posted on 10/02/2006 6:17:25 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG
"attempts to silence all discussion on this issue"

There has been FR discussion on the TTC for several years now. Very few have participated and the discussion has revolved mainly about how the roads are paid for.

Now that the kooks are involved in the discussion, ignorance prevails.

Do you have a high priority corridor in your state?

25 posted on 10/02/2006 7:36:42 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG

They've made a much too well-organized attempt to silence all discussion on this issue.


Without naming individuals, what do these people have to gain from attempting to squelch this issue? Are they members of some shadow organization that's been planning this for years? Illuminata? LOL!


113 posted on 10/02/2006 12:35:17 PM PDT by wolfcreek (You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson