To: VadeRetro
Gould did suggest that creationists who misquote him might not be lying. They could just be stupid.
467 posted on
09/23/2006 5:55:40 PM PDT by
js1138
(The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
To: js1138
Gould did suggest that creationists who misquote him might not be lying. They could just be stupid. We're seeing an incredible failure to recognize contrary evidence right here on this thread. It's either Morton's Demon on steroids or something we're not allowed to directly and accurately characterize anymore. I don't think stupidity alone really works as an explanation, as no one functioning straightforwardly at this level could operate a PC, even running windows.
471 posted on
09/23/2006 5:59:42 PM PDT by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: js1138; VadeRetro
Gould did suggest that creationists who misquote him might not be lying. They could just be stupid.Paraphrasing Dawkins: ignorant, stupid, lying, and/or insane. Note the "and/or".
481 posted on
09/23/2006 6:58:49 PM PDT by
Virginia-American
(What do you call an honest creationist? An evolutionist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson