Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tribune7
But I concede that describing a view-- namely that the fossil record supports gradualism -- to the point that one denies reality would better be called a delusion than a religion.

It might be a delusion in the absence of parallel lines of evidence.

But you are misrepresenting gradualism. Even in geology, gradualism acknowledges the effects of supervolcanos and asteroids -- even planetoids, as with the creation of the moon.

Evolution encompasses many modes and rates. We can observe saltation in plants, as when new species result from polyploidy. We are also learning that some animals have frequent non-fatal chromosome mutations. The more we learn about such phenomena the more obvious it becomes that all the processes needed to account for common descent are happening and can be studied -- eventually in the laboratory.

Variable rates of evolution are mostly the result of geologic events resulting in mass extinctions. Darwin explicitly considered this possibility and rejected it. He was wrong in rejecting it, but he had limited information about geologic processes, and limited information about the underlying processes of variation.

435 posted on 09/23/2006 11:43:48 AM PDT by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
I am not misrepresenting gradualism or Darwin's view or the fossil record.

When you imply, however, that saltation is gradualism you are most certainly misrepresenting it.

438 posted on 09/23/2006 11:48:34 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson