[betty boop]

It shouldn't be a wonder that science is bringing about the end of the Darwinist era.

unspun!!!! It's so good to see you!!!

WRT the above, to retain its preeminence, it seems Darwinism may have to adjust to the astonishing developments in physics and mathematics since its day in the sun of classical Newtonian physics. We'll have to wait and see what happens. Yockey's working on it.... :^)

Thanks so much for writing, unspun! Don't be such a stranger....

[unspun]

WRT the above, to retain its preeminence, it seems Darwinism may have to adjust to the astonishing developments in physics and mathematics since its day in the sun of classical Newtonian physics. We'll have to wait and see what happens. Yockey's working on it.... :^)

Thanks for the note and thank you for thanking me, bb. Glad to poke my nose in, again, and to gain some of your wisdom.

As for Darwinism's ability to adjust, I don't think a philosophy does; it just stays where it is and people go on. And as for Darwinist Fundamentalists adjusting much, well, the impetus of their belief doesn't come from science, as we know, so why should science change them at the core?