[Tribune7]

IOW, the fossil record does not support Darwn's gradualism as Miss Coulter has been saying. . .Absolutely false and already refuted by the post to which you purportedly reply here.

So now your saying Darwin was a gradualist?

I do read your materials, generally. They don't rebut anything. Your post don't rebut anything. You are putting your fingers in your ear, closing your eyes and shouting "Lalalalalala, I can't hear you. Everything was an accident."

[VadeRetro]

So now your saying Darwin was a gradualist?

I've told you what I'm telling you. I've given you detailed supporting materials for what I'm telling you. The best you can do is feign confusion (as quoted above) and then proceed as quoted below.

I do read your materials, generally. They don't rebut anything. Your post don't rebut anything. You are putting your fingers in your ear, closing your eyes and shouting "Lalalalalala, I can't hear you. Everything was an accident."

Not good. Not good at all. The worst part is that you are doing creation/ID that much worse than most of its proponents, including its leading lights Sarfati, Gish, Dembski, and now Coulter, etc.

[js1138]

So now your saying Darwin was a gradualist?

Darwin wrote extensively about both gradualism and saltation. Without radiometric dating and ERVs, and with the rather skimpy fossil record at his disposal, he had no way of settling the issue.

The fact is he understod the problem thoroughly.