IOW, the fossil record does not support Darwn's gradualism as Miss Coulter has been saying. And what's this "would be the same as" stuff? Gradualism, by definition, requires a constant rate i.e. small stages, imperceptibly small, cumulative steps etc..
Not that this will stop you from LOLing back next time
LOL.
Vade, this is a religion with you. Not with me.
Absolutely false and already refuted by the post to which you purportedly reply here. You ignore what Darwin said, what PE is, and what the fossil record is, all of which has been presented to you. Read the materials before "rebutting," please.
What Coulter has been saying is full of untruths and fallacies, as richly documented. So are your own statements.
So here you are in LOLing repetition, refuted but still playing the broken record. Not much more to be said. Your brain on creationism--grownups misbehaving in public. You're one of the poster boys (but so are all the rest of you) for why I don't want to "teach the controversy." "The controversy" exists outside of science and was invented by ineducable LOLing snotheads.
So you're doing this because you just like to misrepresent and act the fool in public? I'm forbidden by forum rules to characterize your performance as accurately as would otherwise be possible.
If I believed you, your behavior would be even harder to understand. Believe it or not, though, it isn't that hard to see Holy Warrior Syndrome in action, even when the Holy Warrior is being less than forthcoming.
You persist in defaming religion by using it as as an epithet. It is interesting that the word religion, for you, implies something false and worthless.