[Dimensio]

So what we have is a living member of the species homo sapines at that stage of homo sapienhood.

Correct. The issue of whether it is a "human being" is a semantics debate. "Human being" is not a scientific term.

As for the twinning, it is another stupide argument by pro abortionists easily dismantled so I'll dismantle it for you. Killing two human beings is twice as bad as killing one. And no twins are totally identical. I'd suggest a refresher course in biology.

It appears that you have completely ignored my question. While it may be more convenient for you to respond as though I had asked a different question, you have not actually addressed what I have asked.

[jwalsh07]

What question? You sure you don't wanna see that neuor friend of mine?

Your arguments suck. You are under the impression that artificially setting a nervous system as the point where the embryo/foetus acquires homo sapienhood is somehow supported by science. It is nonsensical and pathetic.

The honest adherer to scientism simply ackowledges the fact that the embryo is a living human being (which is by the way a scientific term meaning modern member of the species homo sapiens) and proclaims that killing them for research is for the "greater good".

[balrog666]

He's a just another retarded troll.

I suggest you make it a bit more personal so he can understand it at the baby level. Ask him if undifferentiated cells with his mother's DNA are somehow his mother...