To: Non-Sequitur
Actually, that reminds me. Lincoln is about as good a proof of Darwinian fantasies as ever existed. Even Marx, as a correspondent for the London Times, upon observing the awkward Lincoln at a White House social function, said that he resembled nothing so much as an orangutan. If we dig him up and check out the DNA, even Lincoln will probably prove to have had human ancestors.
You and I are never going to be described as "we." By we, do you mean people or simian wannabes? In any way that I disappoint you, yes, you will have to learn to live with that disappointment because you sure as Lincoln's permanent address aren't going to change my mind.
296 posted on
09/22/2006 12:04:26 PM PDT by
BlackElk
(Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
To: orionblamblam
You and I are never going to be described as "we." By we, do you mean people or simian wannabes? See, now, if you inject a note of common sense into a prayer thread, people go bananas, like it's the end of the world. If, on the other hand, you bring this sort of trolling on to an otherwise sensible discussion of science, nothing happens at all. Nothing at all.
Just figured you'd find this interesting.
304 posted on
09/22/2006 12:27:12 PM PDT by
Senator Bedfellow
(If you're not sure, it was probably sarcasm.)
To: BlackElk
Lincoln is about as good a proof of Darwinian fantasies as ever existed. Even Marx, as a correspondent for the London Times, upon observing the awkward Lincoln at a White House social function, said that he resembled nothing so much as an orangutan. This would seem to be more a product of your fantasies than Darwinian. Karl Marx never set foot in the U.S., and he was never a correspondent for The Times. The Times correspondent in the U.S. at the time of the Southern rebellion and the Lincoln Administration would have been William Howard Russell.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson