[Quark2005]

I am doing truth. Darwinians are doing science fiction.

So, exactly what is "fictional" about 'Darwinian' science? Are you capable of being more specific, or are you just going to continue to throw about haphazard libel about science (and scientifically literate people) in general (and in turn, completely play into the negative stereotype liberals have about conservatives)?

You're good at jumping up and down and making a lot of noise, here, but you haven't offered any arguments of real substance - only ad hominems and appeals to consequence.

[BlackElk]

I don't give a damn what Iran's homicidal maniac president (or general population) "think" (assuming that they think) about Dubya, the USA or conservatism or Catholicism or Chriostianity generally. Likewise Ugo Chavez. Likewise, Jacques "Light Fingers" Chirac. Likewise, the New York Times. Likewise, the National Education Association. Likewise, C-Span's Commies in the Morning aka Washington Journal. Likewise Noam Chomsky. Likewise Charles Darwin and his posthumous Monicas. Likewise other liberals/leftists/"progressives" whose "stereotypes" conservatives are proud to be and righfully so. OOOOOH, that Elk is just sooooooo, ummmm, ummmmm, anti-intellectual!!!!! Sooooooo politically incorrect!!!!! Liberals posing as conservatives are sooooooo embarassed!

I have no interest in worrying for my country or my conservatism about human respect (the Catholic term for what the world misthinks) and every interest in having the world become appropriately worried about what America and conservatives think. We have the weapons. They don't.

I practiced law for decades. You did not if you imagine that "science" can be libeled much less that it has been.

What is fictional about Darwinian "science?" Ummmm, everything! If you imagine yourself descended from apes or other simians to be linked later (how many centuries and government funds later???? Never mind!) or that darwinism is truth, then you are a Darwinian Church Lady.

Also "scientifically literate people" is another discredited tautology. First, you are forgetting your claim to be mere trousered apes. I am still waiting for the darwinian answer to whether there is an immortal human soul and, if so, whether it too "evolved" from whatever sould the apes had to immortal.

It only seems to you darwinians that I am jumping up and down because you are not used to being rightfully disrespected or subjected to dissent from darwinian "orthodoxy" protected as you are by federal courts which establish your false religion and force taxpayers who know better to pay for it. You are used to grandiosely setting the terms of the debate and I refuse to play along. You are used to playing establishmentarian and demanding that your critics bear the burden of proof and I refuse to play along. You are pissed. That is only natural but it does not buttress your fantasies as fact.

Go back to your laboratory and genuflect before your beakers and test tubes. I guess it's better than nuthin'.