Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio; wolfcreek
D: You have yet to "demonstrate" your capacity to read. Neither Christianity nor Catholicism owes ANYTHING WHATSOEVER by way of argument to Darwinian delusion or other gummint godless religions. Western civilization is NOT based on Darwin come lately. Darwinianism is NOT the standard. It is the obviously irrational challenge to the Judaeo-Christian basis and standard of Western civilization.

One minor concession to your expressed need for evidence. If you don't believe that this Darwinian delusion is the uniform forced curriculum of gummint skewels [in spite of your citation of a pseudo-scientific apologia for Darwinism/attack on Ann Coulter which includes one of many fedcourt decisions (this time from Kansas) cramming Darwinian delusion down the throats of school kids with taxpayer dollars courtesy of the ACLU (law firm of the secular humanists and other materialists and atheists)]. As Coulter wisely observes, the public schools are the madrassas of the radical left.

If there are drivers who think they can drive safely with blood alcohol of 0.40 in urban areas on 70 MPH interstate highways that does not prove that they can. If there are "scientists" who believe in Darwinian delusion, that they are simians and that they believe in God, this proves nothing but rank confusion and that science has abandoned the search for truth in its quest for tax-subsidized hegemony over people who know better than they.

My assertions are credible: Look at Ann. No excessiely furry body. No bananas in hand or mouth. No public rib scratching. One fine looking human female with no outward appearances of apeness or chimapnzeeness or atheism or other form of liberalism. Presto: Ann is, ummmm, magnificently human and monkeys are not. "People" who think otherwise are, ummmmm, at best questionable. If y'all want to believe that y'all are really apes or baboons, hey, enjoy!!!!

The Bible is per se credible. So is the Teaching Magisterium. Darwin is not.

Simian wannabes are not worthy of respect. Their theories are not worthy of respect. The ones who want to split the difference by claiming to be "theists" while also claiming to be descended from monkeys, apes, gorillas, baboons, chimpanzees are saying that they believe in God but reject His word favoring Darwin's delusions instead. Hmmmmm....schizophrenia, anyone?????

BTW, I did not invent the term "descended from..." in this context. If Darwinian obsessives actually were "descended from" other simians as they hallucinate, the term would accurately describe their regression.

I absolutely do not care whether you believe what I say. I concede absolutely nothing to you much less that I am willfully misrepresenting anything much less falsely (wouldn't a false misrepresentation actually be a true representation????....never mind). The suggestion, rather, is that if you are a simian wannabe, you can feel free to be a simian wannabe, for all that I care. My religion is the truth whether you happen to like it or not. You are free in America and in the Catholic dogma as to free will to adopt whatever fantasies turn you on (and to take the consequences of your choices). Far be it from me to interfere with your choice of monkeys as ancestors. OTOH, don't expect me to be impressed.

The theory of evolution and its promoters need no help in thoroughly discrediting evolution. It is a self-executing discreditation and always has been. Go entertain yourself in your little laboratory. Who knows, maybe you will impress you.

I have not "admitted" anything. I have proclaimed Darwinian delusion not to rise to a level deserving respect or evidence in opposition. The burden of proof lies exclusively on the delusionists who are simian wannabes to prove their ancestry lies among the monkeys.

BTW, if you believe that man has an immortal soul, describe how it "evolved" from the mortal soul of apes. Or do you believe that apes have immortal souls????

Simian ancestors or the Truth of Christ???? Ummmmm, the Truth of Christ every time.

As to your last paragraph: "God is dead!"---Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead!"---God! Also: "Darwin is dead!"---God

266 posted on 09/22/2006 10:10:17 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]


To: BlackElk
[Ann is...] One fine looking human female with no outward appearances of apeness or chimapnzeeness or atheism or other form of liberalism. Presto: Ann is, ummmm, magnificently human and monkeys are not. "People" who think otherwise are, ummmmm, at best questionable. If y'all want to believe that y'all are really apes or baboons, hey, enjoy!!!!

Look at the bones. Look at the genetics. You'll see how closely related primates really are. You are doing pure apologetics, not science.


(And feed that girl a milkshake and a couple of cheeseburgers!)

267 posted on 09/22/2006 10:15:59 AM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

To: BlackElk

I read through the entire tread but, can't find where I posted. Got any idea?


This argument is facinating but, I really don't have an opinion worth expressing except that it is much *easier* to believe God created everything and leave it at that. If taking the *easy* path is the way you choose to see it, power to ya.


282 posted on 09/22/2006 11:34:35 AM PDT by wolfcreek (You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson