[Dimensio]

Dichotomy: Dimensio's childlike faith in Darwinian fable

Please demonstrate that the theory of evolution is a "fable" and that my acceptance of the theory as valid science is "childlike".

............................OR............................... Ann Coulter's mature belief in God as the uncaused cause (particularly coupled with the belief structure of Aquinas's Summa Theologica)????

This has no relevance to the theory of evolution. Your "dichotomy" is meaningless and false.

My ancestors were exclusively human. I gotta believe that Tax-chick's were all human too. Likewise Annie's.

Please provide evidence to support this claim.

Dimensio: There are some nice trees out back to play in. Have a few bananas but try not to scratch your ribs in public.

Insulting me demonstrates neither that you are correct nor that the theory of evolution is false.

[BlackElk]

Don't you swing in tree branches, munch bananas and scratch your ribs??? Was I wrong in conceding to you arguendo that you were probably right in feeling that you personally were descended from apes or chimpanzees or whatever and, of course, missing links (Is that which is nonexistent describable as "missing links") ????

You seem to imagine that the pseudoscientific speculations of a third-rate failed Anglican theology dilletante, crammed down the unsuspecting throats of the intellectually hapless victims of gummint skewels is somehow the standard and that the central beliefs of Western Civilization are a deviation which must prove anything whatsoever in response to faux intellectual heathenism. Aquinas or Darwin???? Aquinas.

We are all familiar with Annie's photos which resemble neither those of chimpanzees nor those of apes. Tax-chick's kids' pictures are on her homepage. My pictures are nunya bidness but sittnick can confirm that I am exclusively human.

You may be right as to childlike. Belief in the ongoing Darwinian fraud is much worse than childlike. My apologies to children. Substitute "gullible."

You may not have noticed but your opinion, as a professed simian, of the truth or falsity of Roman Catholicism is not of, well, critical importance. If you believe that you are descended from monkeys, apes, or chimpanzees and worship Darwin, the great "god" of pseudoscience, why do you expect to be taken seriously?

What on God's green Earth has this middlebrow lowlife sideshow carny Darwin got to do with conservatism???? This IS a conservative website, dontcha know?

There is absolutely no reason to take Darwin seriously. He is dead proof that affluent birth and genius are clean different things. Why do you fantasize that anyone has an obligation to satisfy Darwin's sycophants and gulls with demonstrations of anything. As a Darwinian mind slave, do you really suppose that you are entitled to be taken seriously???

BTW, if the answer is Darwin's Theory of Evolution or Darwin's Greatest Show on Earth or whatever, it was probably an exceptionally silly question.