Replies

Marx, Engels, Hitler, Ugo Chavez, Mao Tse-Tung, Danny Ortega, Margaret Sanger, and (with a certain sense of imminent discovery) Fidel Castro, would certainly agree or have agreed with you. Just because they or their ideas were guilty of mass murder of the innocent, among a near infinity of either things, why should THEY suffer eternally.

A firm belief in God and submission to Him: Don't leave earth without it!

A firm belief in God and submission to Him: Don't leave earth without it!

Just make sure you pick the right one, the right channeler of whatever he tried to tell us all, and the right translations and interpretations of it. Think of what's at stake and what will happen if you make a mistake. And be advised, mistake are no excuse.

"Marx, Engels, Hitler, Ugo Chavez, Mao Tse-Tung, Danny Ortega, Margaret Sanger, and (with a certain sense of imminent discovery) Fidel Castro, would certainly agree or have agreed with you."

I very much doubt the egomaniacal collection of human horrors you've assembled would agree with me about their status as first worm-food, and then later a worm substance of a different sort. If nothing else, their monumental egos would not permit them to contemplate such a fate.

Condemnation to eternal torment implies a life eternal necessary for the contemplated punishment to be inflicted. That's the problem with earthly visions of heavenly consequences; they can easily entrap us in a paradox of our own human invention. I can see that you might feel cheated at the prospect that such villians could avoid eternal torment by escaping into eternal oblivion, but I must disagree with the idea that eternal oblivion can not constitute eternal damnation.

"A firm belief in God and submission to Him: Don't leave earth without it!"

Exactly my point. That misanthropic assemblage you've concocted for our amusment won't be leaving Earth . . . ever . . . and decomposition will, finally, be turning them into something useful.