Well, Nifong already floated the silly idea that the 12:41 picture is of the dancers arriving, to cast doubt on the time stamps.
I predict that whatever Nifong comes up with will be creative, and already shown to be impossible with evidence we've already seen. His timeline will make it seem as if he hasn't looked at much of the evidence.
You predicted that "whatever Nifong comes up with (to cast doubt on the validity of the photo time stamps) will be creative". Maybe creative but almost certainly so transparent and obviously bogus that anyone other folks with room temperature IQs would not buy into it.
Oh, I forgot, the jury pool Nifong hopes to draw from is overflowing with room temperature IQ types!
That idea didn't float too well. Not only are the pictures time-stamped but you can see some players watches in the photos. This would have to be one helluva conspiracy for all that to be wrong.
I have no idea what Nifong can possibly come up with. I don't really see any time-frame when this supposed rape could have occured. Seligmann's alibi evidence boxes him in and Finnerty's alibi may box him in even more.
I wonder if the defense will get anywhere with the motion for a bill of particulars because that would give them a clue. As it stands, it appears even they can't figure out what Nifong could possibly argue. And of Seligmann, Finnerty and Evans, which one is "Adam", which one is "Bret" and which one is "Matt"? I'm still trying to figure that out.