Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike Nifong

As several of us have said, the DEFENSE, that is Elmo's attorneys, likely subpeonaed them to be there. They were NOT likely there by their choice or at the Nifong's direction.


274 posted on 08/30/2006 7:11:44 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]


To: JLS

Gretta teases Nifong has more problems. I will try to summarize.


276 posted on 08/30/2006 7:27:41 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

To: JLS

So, you are saying Elmo's attorneys subpoenaed them to be there - and then stood up twice in the courtroom and said to the Judge - WHY ARE THEY HERE? WHY ARE THEY HERE?

It was on the 6:00 am news today. ELMO's attorneys refuted the ADA assertion that this case has nothing to do with the Duke case by asking the Judge - why the detectives were there.

I believe he was referring to Clayton and Linwood. We know why Himan was there.


281 posted on 08/30/2006 7:56:40 PM PDT by Mike Nifong (Somebody Stop Me !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson