Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: don'tbedenied

Mangum's probation order requires Mangum to submit to drug-testing when requested by the police or the court. The results of that test could conceivably be held away from the Duke case for that reason. Whether it was positive or negative, Nifong would definitely want to keep it back. Only if it was positive for a date-rape drug would he want to use it.


160 posted on 08/30/2006 3:41:01 AM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Jezebelle
Mangum's probation order requires Mangum to submit to drug-testing when requested by the police or the court. The results of that test could conceivably be held away from the Duke case for that reason. Whether it was positive or negative, Nifong would definitely want to keep it back. Only if it was positive for a date-rape drug would he want to use it.

You are probably right about the source of the toxicology examination.

However, the fact that the examination was done under the probation order should not relieve Nifong of his ethical obligation to disclose exculpatory or impeachment evidence.

I chalk this up as one more incident of ethical misconduct by Nifong.

176 posted on 08/30/2006 4:38:18 AM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson