Outside experts say that the NY times reporters have an agenda!!
Okay, here is another point about the DNA that relates to the article. It is common knowledge that a rape will likely leave DNA evidence--even the unnamed outside experts would agree to that. If you committed a rape on a prostitute, you would not declare BEFORE the dna came back that there was no sex, because if a match ocurred you would lose the ability to say that you had consensual sex and fo to jail for a long time. At the time the players said publicly before the results came back that they had no sex, the "experts" said they made a mistake. But it was brilliant. They could only commit themselves if they knew the results in advance, and they could only know those results if they were telling the truth. How does this related back to the article? Well, unlike Gottlieb, who creates his story after the fact, the players provided contemporaneous accounts that match the evidence collected later. Why is that not in the article.
Just shoddy shoddy work.
I thought there were three DNA matches from CGM, and that Cheshire said they were "known to police".
Key point. Their accounts have remained unchanged, and they match the forensic evidence.