2. Assuming that my judgment, discernment about my loved one is at least as flawed is just as cheeky.
Actually I never assumeed you to have "discernment and judgement."
3. But then, I've never observed naysayers lacking in cheekiness.
I am willing to believe you have observed 100% more naysayers than UFO's. Real ones that is.
Depends on one's definition of "none of you" and of "real evidence." Linda Moulton Howe has amassed quite an amount of evidence. The scientific evidence proving a great majority of crop circles to have very mysteriously altered plant nodes (microwaves of unusual characteristics); micro fine particle dusting of iron particles; and altered magnetic anomolies within the crop circle vs outside the circle; the repeatedly photographed presence of orbs flitting about speedily within the area the crop circles then immediately appear at. . . . some of this published in very quality scientific peer reviewed journals in the plant sciences.
MD's who've had patients go to bed pregnant from an exam of a 3-4th month fetus and wake up without the fetus as a 2nd exam proved the next day . . . with a vivid recall without hypnosis of an abduction and retrieval of the fetus by the ET's . . . sometimes with the usual tell-tale marks on the woman's body . . . and sometimes on the bodies of her other children. TRY TELLING SUCH A MOTHER THAT THERE'S NO EVIDENCE!!! TALK ABOUT CHEEKY! There's other evidence but I'll stop there. Naysayers tend to dismiss derisively anything short of an ET parked in THEIR garage with ET's still in the machine.
Just as a magician hoaxes an audience, you percieve your Assumed "Phenomena" with awe.
I don't recall your crawlilng around in my brain or consciousness sufficient to know how I perceive anything. I now can say I have seen my first UFO a few weeks ago. It matched perfectly the common photos and rendered drawings of one of the standard TRIANGLE types. It's unclear whether that particular sort is ET driven or military driven or both. The "phenomena" was far from assumed. My binoculars do not open into the twilight zone. It's arrogantly, haughtily, snobbishly, insultingly cheeky to accuse me otherwise.
2. Assuming that my judgment, discernment about my loved one is at least as flawed is just as cheeky.
Actually I never assumeed you to have "discernment and judgement."
It's plainly obvious that your insulting ASSumptions about my discernment and judgment are quite as you described above. They are clearly dismissive, derisive, hostile, arrogant, haughty, snobbish. IMPRESSIVE.
3. But then, I've never observed naysayers lacking in cheekiness.
I am willing to believe you have observed 100% more naysayers than UFO's. Real ones that is.
They do tend to come out of the woodwork like moths to a flame on UFO threads. Quite a curious psychological phenomena, actually. Methinks it must have some relationship with insecurities and/or raw brazen immature arrogance.