I have noticed that neither Hard? research nor Hard facts are any part of your argument. But cary on. TaTa
WRONG AGAIN! Is it really that much FUN being so brazenly, cheekily wrong?
Evidently you missed the stuff about biophysicist's W. C. Levengood's peer reviewed stuff in the scholarly peer reviewed journals
Physiologia Plantarum
and in the American
Journal of Scientific Exploration.
(Vol. 9, No. 2, Pages 191-199) re the hard researched evidence of:
"So far, no one has refuted his hypothesis that spinning plasma vortices containing microwaves, magnetic fields and electric fields produced by charge separation in plasma form the complex energy systems that create the crop formations."
. . .
"In a 1995 paper entitled "Semi-Molten Meteoric Iron Associated with A Crop Formation" published in the Journal of Scientific Exploration [ref above], Levengood and his research colleague, John Burke, wrote: 'Out of a four year investigation of plant tissues taken from over eighty crop formations, located within five countries, we report data from a single sample set which indicates a 'close encounter,' between the complex forces producing these flattened circular type formations and meteoric material from the atmosphere."
"Both soil chunks and plant tissue taken from specific regions within a 1993 wheat crop formation in Cherhill, Wiltshire, England, exhibited a high degree of magnetic susceptibility which originated within adherent coatings consisting of the commingled iron oxides, hematite (Fe2O2) and magnetite (FeO4) fused into a heterogeneous mass, and having the properties of a 'magnetic glaze.' The makeup of this material appears to be of meteoric origin and apparently impacted the ground while in the semi-molten state. Presence of meteoric material adhering to both soil and plant tissues, casts considerable doubt on this being an artificially prepared or 'hoaxed' formation."
Just in case it was missed . . . the 'magnetic glaze' is rather HARD. It's considerably harder than the denial fantasies so many naysayers have about such facts.
Here's another bit under some of the photos in the book by Linda Moulton Howe: MYSTERIOIUS LIGHTS AND CROP CIRCLES p 250:
"The wheat leaf at Cherhill was not damaged by this molton iron deposit because of the Liedenfrost effect. Suddenly heated leaves can release steam through their stomata that creates a protective layer between the leaf and whatever warm substance touches them. In this case, it was the deposit of semi-molten meteoric iron particles."
And on p 253:
"Since his Cherhill paper, Levengood has found high concentrations of magnetic iron in many other crop formations, occasionally more than 700 times higher concentrations than the normal 0.4 milligrams of magnetite per gram of soil. Soil samples continue to confirm distribution by centrifugal spinning force."
Qx note: The orbs of light often seen in crop circles being formed are typically perceived to be spinning, as I understand it. Common additional hard evidence has to do with plant nodes.
p 258
"In one of Levengood's English case files, he had photographs of stretched and reoriented growth nodes and expulsion cavities found in the wheat formation at Stanton St. Bernard on June 22, 1999. He stressed that 'the energy causing node expansion appears to have microwave components whereas the energy inducing growth enhancement in the seeds has electrophoretic properties.' Electrophoresis is the motion of charged particles, especially colloidal properties, through a relatively stationary liquid under the influence of an applied elecric field."
photo caption on the same page:
"Stanton St. Bernard, Wiltshire, formation discovered June 22, 1999, in wheat field. Apical upper nodes were lengthened and reoriented. Penultimate nodes further down the stems had expulsion cavities. Both effects have been simulated by Levengood by putting control plants in microwave ovens for a few seconds."
But, hey, I realize that hard evidence is not likely to be any better received than soft evidence. Folks just do not appreciate having their cosmology rattled, regardless of the facts.