Point well taken. Wouldn't the fact that prosecutors have relied on these labs for evidence in a process that we now know is tainted be legal grounds for someone to argue that all testing for their case must be done by a third party?
It seems that if I could show the process to be tainted that I would have legal cause to demand an alternate process (private labs other than those implicated and chosen by a third party with a double-blind process?) in order to receive a fair trial?
Just a thought. Yes, I agree that he may get railroaded. What scares me is how deeply the DA and others have put their reputations, careers and public image on the line for this guys arrest. If they're wrong about this guy they're going to take a lot of heat. So, I don't see them backing down from this guy very easily. They're invested in making him hang.
This is what worries me. If I could be certain of Karr's guilt, then obviously it wouldn't matter. But so far, all the Boulder authorities seem to have done is allow the matter of Karr to spin wildly out of control. If he's innocent of this particular crime, no matter how weird he obviously is, then this piles yet more tragedy on top of an already deeply tragic botched investigation.