see post 820...
If you can make sure you try and catch one of her interviews after you get home.
She clearly said they spent some 7 to 8 hours with him yesterday and that she and the firm she belongs to is representing him. One of the gals in the firm (not Jamie though) did represent Karr on his CA charges before he skipped out on them.
I was quite puzzled by her interview, it seems to me that they are not going to be seeking a defense of insanity or mental illiness for him. But that may all change if his DNA does come back as a match.
At this point, the man has not been charged with the crime, so any idea of how to defend him, should it be necessary, is still way too premature.
Regarding the DNA, several of the nation's most knowledgeable people on the subject have said they would not be surprised if the results are inconclusive. Three who come to mind are Barry Scheck, Michael Baden and Dr. Henry Lee. So brace yourself for that possibility.
Again, if he's guilty, he deserves what's coming to him. But all of us who cherish the Bill of Rights should be disgusted at the way the Boulder DA has handled the matter of Mr. Karr to date. That is an issues separate and distinct from whether or not this particular man is or is not guilty of this particular crime.