Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Yaelle

I think there is ample room for your objections about Burke in the forensics; or that Patsy didn't do it. But I do think the evidence is overwhelming that some kind of deception, for whatever reason, was going on. There are too many claims about that night that don't fit with a lot of forensics.

I'll post those 8 questions again so every one can look at them because I think it's really important to definitively answer those questions...


531 posted on 08/21/2006 4:13:08 PM PDT by ableLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies ]


To: ableLight

There are many deceptions in the Ramsey version of events; I agree.

I just found a new one on this thread today. Patsy told the cops that she dressed before she found JonBenet missing?? Now THAT does seem strange. A woman of her means and wardrobe just DOES NOT put on her party clothing from the night before. Sorry. Does not compute. We were giving her a pass, saying that she probably was walking around in her nightie and only whipped on whatever was handy while she was in a distressed state before the police got there.

The pineapple and little Burke's voice on the tape were never explained. And that fiber evidence seems fishy too. The family may be totally innocent but some things could have been explained in detail by them to help them look more innocent.


535 posted on 08/21/2006 4:19:36 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson