That's a good point. The stun gun injuries were, like so many things in this case, disputed and I don't know if there is any definitive word on whether or not they were really stun gun injuries. But assuming they were, one would have to explain that. Given all the forensics evidence that has piled up for a family-insider job I would even entertain the possibility that someone outside the family was also involved. Who knows.
But more to the point, how do we know the age of those injuries? A 911 call was made 3 days before the murder from the Ramsey house. What was that all about? Could there have been a stun gun present in the house prior to the murder and no longer there the night of?
Your thoughts?
I saw a photo of the marks on JB's neck. It's Wecht's theory that they happened just before the murder. BTW I believe that what looks like incredible bungling was deliberately done b/c there was a child-molesting ring in the area, and they had the power to get the investigation ruined. I believe that JB had been molested in the past.