What makes me skeptical of PR's explanations is not that she can't explain this or that detail but that she didn't say so long and loud immediately after the crime when her memory would have been freshest. The delays in submitting to questioning by LE are what make people suspicious. Does that make her guilty of anything? No. But it does make a person wonder. I would think that even someone that thinks there is no possibility that PR was involved in JBR's death would have to admit that.
I got over that, already. I look at the case through a much broader lens of possibilities and probabilities than constant suspicion of the Ramseys because they didn't do x or say y. Ten years ago, that's about all I thought of, whenever I thought of it.
And there are large numbers of things about the case that don't fit the Ramseys as perps, at all.
I've mentioned some of them in my various posts and to me, they are totally exculpatory of the Ramseys, yet some have thought they nailed the Ramseys. This has left me utterly mystified and quite disappointed, to say the least.
I hurt for the Ramseys.
I'm sorry, but I would have lawyered up same as Ramsey's once I got the vibe that the investigation wasn't about excluding me so they could move on but about proving it was me and that no moving on was going to occur. I think that shift of focus from excluding to proving came prematurely to the investigation and distorted it from then on.
Just because *you* would handle things differently is not proof of guilt or grounds for suspicion. There is no *normal* way to handle or respond to an event like this.