It isn't getting weaker, it's just static.
A judge had to agree to the issuing of the arrest warrant that brought him back from Thailand. The DA presented an affadavit to the judge to go along with the warrant request. According to a Media report I saw, the affadavit for reasons to arrest Karr was somewhere between 50 and 80 pages.
The DA issued a statement saying that material in the affadavit is being kept sealed by order of the judge and at her request, because it contains material not known to the public and important material to pursuing justice in the case.
We'll just have to wait and see what she's got and what conclusions she reaches and I'm prepared to accept it...with the caveat, unless something comes up to show she's not honest or competent. If a trial ensues, I'll pay attention to the trial to see if I agree with the outcome.
I'm not forgetting that Karr claims to have been with JonBenet when she died. HELLO! Is anyone home?? What kind of DA would ignore such declarations.
I cannot speak for what happened when CA passed along what it had on Karr to Boulder back 5 yrs. ago. I hear there's controversy about that and I don't know the facts.
But now, this guy must be ruled in or out, to the best of our system's ability to do so.
Absolutely. I don't disagree at all with bringing him in and sorting out the facts. Karr almost seems to be begging them to do so.
I just see all this hyperventilation in the media over him when I've yet to see any tangible evidence linking him to the crime other than his own words. If they had something solid, *somebody* has usually leaked it by now. Either congrats to the DA's office for being tight-lipped or they really have a suspect without much of a case.