Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: txrangerette

"I don't care what it is"

Are you saying that no amount of evidence implicating PR or JR would sway you? I don't think that is what you really meant, so I thought I'd ask.

I hope I'm not getting hung up on anything as you say. I hope I'm just asking obvious, common sense questions about what little we do know. You're right, there's not enough information to convict anyone. But we can still ask questions about what we do know.

I think to say that we know nothing at all about the case would make this forum pointless; which I don't think is the case. The discussions of JMK prove that no one on this forum believes we know nothing.

As is true of any of the evidence regarding JMK or an intruder, the coroner's report could be wrong, the forensics techniques could be wrong or the police officer could have lied about the smell. Maybe I've misunderstood the technique (has anyone traced my steps?). Any number of things are possible, but I think it's common sense to question the time of death given what we do know. I would think that any objective inquirer would ask these questions.


1,608 posted on 08/24/2006 9:52:46 AM PDT by ableLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1602 | View Replies ]


To: ableLight

BTW, noticing others comments, yes, anyone could have been dishonest or mistaken about any point in the investigation. This includes people looking into possibilities of an intruder or of JMK specifically. But if I'm going to be objective - put another way, if I want to know what really happened - I have to look at all of it and take it with the aforementioned caveats.


1,610 posted on 08/24/2006 9:56:10 AM PDT by ableLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1608 | View Replies ]

To: ableLight

I'm sorry, I did NOT say we know nothing about this case.

I specifically said we don't have enough of it, and that includes anything developed heretofore by anybody, to hone in on one thing like the pineapple thing, or something else for that matter, without realizing that there's more to it.

I need more. So do you, but you're not going to admit it. And I have thrown away NOTHING. Without more, it isn't enough.

So, if no intruder, by your narrow view of what has been put forth so far, did the Ramseys walk in, feed JonBenet pineapple, then kill her? As in bam, bam, bam? You said no intruder, yet you had everything so fixed and so lined up, by what you said, it seems like the Ramseys did what the intruder didn't.

Yet it makes no more sense for the Ramseys, in just the way you stated it, than for an intruder.


1,619 posted on 08/24/2006 10:09:52 AM PDT by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1608 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson