Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lexinom

Ok then. Then, if Creationism is effectively holding to a standard of absolute truth, it isn't science by definition.


500 posted on 08/20/2006 10:17:01 PM PDT by Dante Alighieri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies ]


To: Dante Alighieri
Okay... you do accept that science has to make certain very basic assumptions, do you not?: that truth can be discerned from falsehood; that the observer is conscious and aware; that the ratio of the circumference to the diameter is a very specific, albeit complex, number.

Very humbly, not meaning to attack you in way, I would submit that it is your viewpoint that is the illogical one because you cannot give a rational basis for the presuppositions you must make to even do science.

506 posted on 08/20/2006 10:34:19 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson