yeah. and people get abducted and anal-probed by little gray aliens.
prove your assertion. at least cough up some documentation.
It's anecdotal, secondhand. I don't have documentation, but it seems to fit with the well-known inaccuracies of various dating methodolgies. Some fairly major assumptions about constancy have to be made - all of which begin assuming the conclusion (Lyell's geological timeframe) as the premise. They are assumptions not subject to falsification, since to do so under the scientific method would require a time machine. That ain't science, it's "science" - speculation.