[Coyoteman]

yes, although the definition of science doesn't say creationism in it, it is obviously part of the scientific field. Please read the defintion more open minded. You guys cannot redefine a word because you disagree with what it includes. Come on now...And the many creation scientists that are very much in this debate certainly are very real.

You claimed the definition of "science" includes "creation" and I provided a link to 29 definitions on the web, none of which included either "creation" or "creationism" (google "define:science").

I am not redefining a word because I disagree with what it includes. You clearly are trying to do so.

By the way, creation "scientists" are not scientists because they do not follow the scientific method. They are apologists (defenders of religion).

[fabian]

maybe I didn't say it correctly...the definition of science would clearly include the study of creationism. I didn't mean that the word creationism is included in the definition. I'm not misrepresenting the definition at all. All anyone needs do is read the defintion...it's clear for everyone. Your confusion is trying to exclude a very interesting field of science. Can't you be just a little more honest.