Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fabian
The fossils that you guys point to are simply completed life forms.

Did you expect transitionals to be some weird half-forms?

You have a limited understanding of evolution which is nonsensical considering how many times you show up on these threads. You should have learned something by now.

455 posted on 08/20/2006 7:42:10 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies ]


To: stands2reason

of course the fossil record would show the slow developement of one life form into another over the millions of years that toe calls for. Since it simply doesn't, you guys just conjecture what are transitionals which by there structure one could say is or is not transitional. Very unconvincing and along with the mounting evidence for ID and creationism, not believable. If it were convincing, no reputable scientist would see it as false. And so many do...not just peons like me.


460 posted on 08/20/2006 7:55:59 PM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson