Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hail to the chief

all you need to do is simply look at some of the incredible discoveries such as the dna code which is more complex than a computer code. There are so many fascinating things that point to a creator. If you look up the definition of science it would include the study of creationism. It simply is a very strong opposing theory to toe. Hope you can at least be open minded enough to admit that.


427 posted on 08/20/2006 6:49:29 PM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]


To: fabian

"all you need to do is simply look at some of the incredible discoveries such as the dna code which is more complex than a computer code. There are so many fascinating things that point to a creator."

An unintelligent creator perhaps, for leaving 98.5% of our entire 3.2 billion nucleotide base genome more or less consisting of ERVs, pseudogenes, and noncoding DNA.

"If you look up the definition of science it would include the study of creationism. It simply is a very strong opposing theory to toe. Hope you can at least be open minded enough to admit that."

I don't see any definition of science that includes creationism. Creationism isn't science as it isn't falsfiable, tentative, naturalistic, parsimonious, accurate, encompassing nor supported.


432 posted on 08/20/2006 6:58:28 PM PDT by Dante Alighieri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies ]

To: fabian
all you need to do is simply look at some of the incredible discoveries such as the dna code which is more complex than a computer code.

It has been evolving longer, with better quality control.

There are so many fascinating things that point to a creator.

We are talking science, not metaphysics or religion.

If you look up the definition of science it would include the study of creationism.

Do a google for "define:science" and you will get 29 web definitions. None includes "creation" or "creationism."

It simply is a very strong opposing theory to toe. Hope you can at least be open minded enough to admit that.

Neither ID nor creation is a scientific theory. Both are religious beliefs.

435 posted on 08/20/2006 7:01:13 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson