all you need to do is simply look at some of the incredible discoveries such as the dna code which is more complex than a computer code. There are so many fascinating things that point to a creator. If you look up the definition of science it would include the study of creationism. It simply is a very strong opposing theory to toe. Hope you can at least be open minded enough to admit that.
"all you need to do is simply look at some of the incredible discoveries such as the dna code which is more complex than a computer code. There are so many fascinating things that point to a creator."
An unintelligent creator perhaps, for leaving 98.5% of our entire 3.2 billion nucleotide base genome more or less consisting of ERVs, pseudogenes, and noncoding DNA.
"If you look up the definition of science it would include the study of creationism. It simply is a very strong opposing theory to toe. Hope you can at least be open minded enough to admit that."
I don't see any definition of science that includes creationism. Creationism isn't science as it isn't falsfiable, tentative, naturalistic, parsimonious, accurate, encompassing nor supported.
It has been evolving longer, with better quality control.
There are so many fascinating things that point to a creator.
We are talking science, not metaphysics or religion.
If you look up the definition of science it would include the study of creationism.
Do a google for "define:science" and you will get 29 web definitions. None includes "creation" or "creationism."
It simply is a very strong opposing theory to toe. Hope you can at least be open minded enough to admit that.
Neither ID nor creation is a scientific theory. Both are religious beliefs.