To: MAWG
Why unbelievable? That i'm skeptical? I hope in subsequent days that as more information is released that i will be convinced they got the right guy. But at this point merely having a confession doesn't convince me and as to the details he has given that supposedly only the killer and those working on the case would have known, i'm simply waiting to see if that is truly accurate (that it was a closely held secret) and even if so whether he could have somehow gotten ahold of this info. In other words, that perhaps these details weren't as tightly guarded as we are led to believe and that someone obsessed with the case might have stumbled upon a few of them.
917 posted on
08/16/2006 4:20:48 PM PDT by
Humbug
(Thank you for taking the time to read this tagline.)
To: Humbug
Why unbelievable? That i'm skeptical? I hope in subsequent days that as more information is released that i will be convinced they got the right guy. But at this point merely having a confession doesn't convince me and as to the details he has given that supposedly only the killer and those working on the case would have known, i'm simply waiting to see if that is truly accurate (that it was a closely held secret) and even if so whether he could have somehow gotten ahold of this info. In other words, that perhaps these details weren't as tightly guarded as we are led to believe and that someone obsessed with the case might have stumbled upon a few of them.OR, that Karr knew the person who killed JonBenet and was given details right from the horse's mouth, so to speak. Of course that wouldn't explain what I heard earlier...and that was that they had a DNA match to this guy. The story may twist and turn yet.
952 posted on
08/16/2006 4:34:38 PM PDT by
Chena
("I'm not young enough to know everything." (Oscar Wilde))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson