Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ArGee

Just guessing but I think the correct definition of theory as it is used in science has been posted to this site 1000's of times by dozens of different posters. And people still use that work incorrectly.

It isn't a question of being able to explain it, some just will not listen.


46 posted on 08/03/2006 12:53:33 PM PDT by RFC_Gal (It's not just a boulder; It's a rock! A ro-o-ock. The pioneers used to ride these babies for miles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: RFC_Gal
Just guessing but I think the correct definition of theory as it is used in science has been posted to this site 1000's of times by dozens of different posters. And people still use that work incorrectly.

So you would say that the entire explaination of your science is understanding what a theory is?

I don't know what your science is, but I don't think it's anything I would be interested in.

What I would be interested in is an elevator statement explaining the mechanism that introduces a change in a complex organism, such as a rabbit or a chipmunk, to a layman.

If it's not doable, it's not science, it's magic.

Shalom.

57 posted on 08/03/2006 12:58:02 PM PDT by ArGee (The Ring must not be allowed to fall into Hillary's hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson