Anyone who has studied logic knows that truth and validity are mutually exclusive, but that a logically valid and truthful argument are the highest form.
Modus Ponens, Modus Tolens, Square of Opposition, Tautology, Venn Diagrams, and all that rot. ;)
Kalam is a good instrument to move the atheist at least into deism. Hopefully, he will continue with inquiry until he reaches some form of theism, and from that, hopefully, into Christianity.
Sauron
I'm sorry, what? So if truth and validity are mutually exclusive - which will be news to logicians everywhere, no doubt - how do you actually achieve this "highest form" of a valid and truthful argument? Is it like squaring the circle, or solving the mystery of where missing socks go when they leave the dryer?