Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN

I am simply saying that existence is a slam dunk demonstration that not everything has a precedent. Existence being a broader concept than the universe.

There is at least one instance of an existence without precedent.

My own take on this is that we are not equipped to comprehend the problem. Our intuitive understanding of time and causation fails on the big question.

But at the level we are capable of understanding, we can observe uncaused events.


350 posted on 08/04/2006 12:42:38 PM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
There is at least one instance of an existence without precedent.

I completely agree with this statement.

I think it has to be a being, and not a thing.

Sauron

383 posted on 08/04/2006 3:30:51 PM PDT by sauron ("Truth is hate to those who hate Truth" --unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson