The Kalam Cosmological Argument (q.v., explained at the bottom of Post #181) does nothing of the sort.
You are mistaken: It makes no attempt to cover the issue of a creator. It merely is a mechanism to make it patently obvious that our own universe...had to have been created.
The implication, however, is that someone, or something had to have caused this act of creation. In other words, OURS IS A CREATED UNIVERSE.
The KCA offers logical proof of this. It has never been refuted, and it dates back many centuries.
(Q.v., last part of Post #181, read it carefully.)
You are mistaken:
Nope. The argument presupposes a creator that was not created. Think about this carefully.