To: Virginia-American; Coyoteman
Obviously. It's evidence that if you go back far enough, the snakes' ancestors had actual functional legs. Another area in Genesis where the Bible writers got it right. The curse God put on the serpent was that it was to crawl on it's belly. Obviously it had legs before that and lost them.
254 posted on
08/03/2006 7:47:49 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
Another area in Genesis where the Bible writers got it right. An area where they perhaps got it wrong? You don't get much from eating apples...
255 posted on
08/03/2006 7:52:11 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: metmom
Another area in Genesis where the Bible writers got it right. The curse God put on the serpent was that it was to crawl on it's belly. Obviously it had legs before that and lost them. Wonder if some ancient Canaanite or Hebrew or Sumerian, whoever first came up with the "just so" story of "how the snake lost its legs", had actually studied a snake skeleton and seen the vestiges?
To: metmom
Another area in Genesis where the Bible writers got it right. The curse God put on the serpent was that it was to crawl on it's belly. Obviously it had legs before that and lost them.A pity that the Bible doesn't record what appalling sin of dolphins and whales made God remove their legs too.
319 posted on
08/04/2006 1:24:33 AM PDT by
Thatcherite
(I'm PatHenry I'm the real PatHenry all the other PatHenrys are just imitators)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson