Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sopater
Arp, who for almost 30 years worked at the Mount Palomar and Mount Wilson Observatories in California, has raised eyebrows by suggesting that quasars (extremely energetic astronomical objects) are not the super-distant bodies they are generally taken to be, but are in fact ejecta from the centers of active galaxies. Images he took while at the observatories, he contends, show high-redshift quasars physically connected to low-redshift galaxies — an impossibility if redshift is an accurate measure of distance.

I have questioned myself for some time the assumption that increasing redshift equals increasing distance from Earth. Almost all of modern astronomy is based on that assumptin - what if it is wrong and redshifts can be caused by other factors, such as gravitation that is not expected?

9 posted on 08/02/2006 8:25:18 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
I have questioned myself for some time the assumption that increasing redshift equals increasing distance from Earth.

As well you should. That, my friend, is science.

Discovery By UCSD Astronomers Poses A Cosmic Puzzle: Can A 'Distant' Quasar Lie Within A Nearby Galaxy?
10 posted on 08/02/2006 8:49:01 AM PDT by Sopater (Creatio Ex Nihilo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson