[lirium]

Prof. Stephen JOnes is the stickler for peer review, has to be since he is a professor of physics at BYU.
Right now he is telling about how seeing the video of WTC7 falling straight down is what got him wondering.
WTC7 is the big coverup in the media. No plane hit it, but it fell straight down at 530 pm on 9/11.
He went on to do analysis of molten metal from the towers and figured out that thermite was used to cut the columns before imploding the tower.
Some of his peer reviewers are also scientists at Brigham Young U.

[hipaatwo]

[Charlespg]

Prof. Stephen JOnes is the stickler for peer review, has to be since he is a professor of physics at BYU. Right now he is telling about how seeing the video of WTC7 falling straight down is what got him wondering. WTC7 is the big coverup in the media. No plane hit it, but it fell straight down at 530 pm on 9/11. He went on to do analysis of molten metal from the towers and figured out that thermite was used to cut the columns before imploding the tower. Some of his peer reviewers are also scientists at Brigham Young U.

sounds like the fruit loops have run away from the bowl

[denydenydeny]

No plane hit it, but it fell straight down at 530 pm on 9/11.

Um, genius, the towers didn't fall because they were hit by planes.

They fell because of the fire started by the jet fuel in the planes that weakened the structural integrity of the steel in the towers. The fire spread to WTC 7 after the collapse of WTC 1 and 2, and WTC eventually fell the same way.